A family business is any enterprise in which a
majority of the ownership or control lies within a family and in which two
or more family members are directly involved. It is a vital force in the
American economy. About 90% of all U.S. businesses are family owned or
controlled. They range in size from the traditional small business to a
third of the Fortune 500 companies. It is estimated that family businesses
generate about half of the country’s Gross National Product and half of
the total wages paid. This economic engine pulls the free enterprise
system for our nation, and the American economy depends heavily on the
success and existence of the family business.
It seems extremely alarming that such a vital force
has such a poor survival rate. Less than one third of family businesses
survive the transition from first to second generation ownership. At any
given time, 40% of U.S. businesses are facing the transfer of ownership
issue, and the options are few. The business founders can either close the
doors, sell to an outsider or employee, retain ownership but hire outside
management, or retain family ownership and management control. To be one
of the few family businesses that survive transfer of ownership requires a
good understanding of your business and your family. There are four basic
reasons why family firms fail to transfer the business from generation to
generation successfully:
The primary cause of failure is lack of planning.
Like the family system, roles in the business such as president, manager,
employee, stockholder/owner carry specific responsibilities and
expectations. And, like the home environment, businesses have their own
communication, conflict resolution, and decision-making styles. Conflicts
can arise when roles assumed in one system intrude on roles in the other,
when communication patterns used in one system don’t work in the other,
or when there are conflicts of interest between the two systems.
The boss and employee roles a husband and wife might
assume at work most likely will not be appropriate as at-home roles.
Likewise, a role assumed in the family may not work well in the business.
As an example, offspring who are peacemakers at home may find themselves
mediating management conflicts between family members whether or not they
have the desire or qualifications to do so. A special case of role carry
over may occur when an individual is continually cast in a particular
role. This happens primarily to children. Everyone grows up with a
label…the good one; the black sheep; the smart one; Dad’s favorite.
While a person may outgrow a label or perception, the family often views
that person carrying that attribute. This perception may affect the way
that person operates in the business.
It is important to understand that the family’s
strong emotional attachments and overriding sense of loyalty to each other
create unique management situations. System overlap is apparent when
conflicts of interest arise between the family and the business. Some
families put personal concerns ahead of business issues instead of trying
to achieve a balance between the two. For example, solving a family
problem, such as giving an incompetent relative a position in the firm,
ignores the company’s personnel needs but meets the needs of family
loyalty. Another example of conflict of interest may be a business
owner’s feeling that giving children equal salaries is fair. Siblings
who have more responsibility but receive the same pay as those with less
responsibility usually resent it.
Much of this behavior can be eliminated or manager by
devising policies that meet the needs of both the family and the business.
Developing these policies is part of the family business strategic
planning process, reflected in a Family Business Charters. In creating a
charter, family business members go through a process of scenario planning
where they brainstorm about things that could happen to them and the
business and then develop guidelines for dealing with these
“what-ifs.” This serves two purposes. First, deciding how to handle
situations in the hypothetical is easier then confronting an actual
crisis, and, second, it lessens the likelihood that family members will be
shocked by each other’s reactions. The process of creating a charter
deliberately requires intense work on the part of business/family members,
which itself creates a sense of teamwork with stronger buy-in. Family
members often assume they know each other and can rely on predicted
responses, but good business sense is to avoid the unexpected and provide
a road map through complicated times and into the future. The family
business that plans together stays together.
Tony Belak